Skip to main content
HairCited

Systematic review of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation and composition for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia.

MaryJo E Kramer, Terrence C Keaney
Systematic Review Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2018 55 citações
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'haircited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D29790267'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Tipo de Estudo
Systematic Review
População
Patients with androgenetic alopecia
Intervenção
Systematic review of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) preparation and composition for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. None
Comparador
None
Desfecho Primário
Hair loss treatment outcomes
Direção do Efeito
Mixed
Risco de Viés
Unclear

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections have gained popularity in dermatology practice as a treatment for hair loss. As an autologous blood product, PRP is categorized as a minimally manipulated tissue by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and thus evades extensive regulation. As a result, there is a lack of standardization of its preparation and final composition. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to provide a systematic review of the various PRP preparation protocols and PRP compositions utilized in clinical trials for the treatment of hair loss. METHODS & MATERIALS: A review of the literature was performed using PubMed and Ovid/Medline in November 2017 using the search terms "Platelet-Rich Plasma" and ("Alopecia" or "Hair Loss"), including all publication dates. Human clinical trials in the English language were included. RESULTS: Nineteen studies (in 15 articles) met the inclusion criteria for analysis. Only 21% of these studies reported all PRP preparation factors analyzed, and only 32% of the protocols reported the platelet count for both the initial whole blood and final PRP product. CONCLUSION: The current reporting of PRP preparation methodology and final composition is inconsistent and insufficient to enable comparison between studies and determination of efficacy for particular treatment applications.

Resumo Rápido

Platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) injections have gained popularity in dermatology practice as a treatment for hair loss and there is a lack of standardization of its preparation and final composition.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers