Skip to main content
HairCited

Types of hair loss and treatment options, including the novel low-level light therapy and its proposed mechanism.

Mahyar Ghanaat
Review Southern medical journal 2010 66 件の引用
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'haircited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D20689478'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

研究タイプ
In Vitro
対象集団
None
介入
Types of hair loss and treatment options, including the novel low-level light therapy and its proposed mechanism. None
比較対照
None
主要アウトカム
hair loss
効果の方向
Positive
バイアスリスク
Unclear

Abstract

Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common form of hair loss in men, and female pattern hair loss (FPHL) is the most common form of hair loss in women. Traditional methods of treating hair loss have included minoxidil, finasteride, and surgical transplantation. Currently there is a myriad of new and experimental treatments. In addition, low-level light therapy (LLLT) has recently been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of hair loss. There are several theories and minimal clinical evidence of the safety and efficacy of LLLT, although most experts agree that it is safe. More in vitro studies are necessary to elucidate the mechanism and effectiveness at the cellular level, and more controlled studies are necessary to assess the role of this new treatment in the general population.

要約

Low-level light therapy (LLLT) has recently been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of hair loss and there are several theories and minimal clinical evidence of the safety and efficacy, although most experts agree that it is safe.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers