Skip to main content
HairCited

Emerging Nonsteroid-Based Procedural Therapies for Alopecia Areata: A Systematic Review.

Mark C Marchitto, Azam Qureshi, Dustin Marks, Olabola Awosika, Monica Rengifo-Pardo et al.
Systematic Review Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] 2019 5 sitasi
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'haircited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D31403534'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Jenis Studi
Systematic Review
Populasi
None
Intervensi
Emerging Nonsteroid-Based Procedural Therapies for Alopecia Areata: A Systematic Review. None
Pembanding
None
Luaran Utama
None
Arah Efek
Mixed
Risiko Bias
Unclear

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Alopecia areata (AA) is a common form of patchy, nonscarring hair loss. Although intralesional steroid injections are currently the mainstay procedural therapy for AA, other nonsteroid-based procedural therapies, including platelet-rich plasma (PRP), ultraviolet radiation (UVR), and laser-based modalities, are emerging as practical options. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review nonsteroid-based procedural therapies for AA and recapitulate the available clinical data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed searching PubMed/MEDLINE databases identifying studies investigating PRP, UVR, and laser-based modalities for AA treatment. RESULTS: Literature search yielded 644 articles encompassing PRP, UVR, and laser treatment modalities for AA. Of the 644 articles, 46 met inclusion criteria. Although numerous reports demonstrate strong potential for PRP, UVR, and laser modalities in treating AA, high-quality evidence supporting their efficacy is still lacking. CONCLUSION: There is an abundance of evidence for nonsteroid-based procedural therapies in the treatment of AA. Randomized control trials comparing these treatment options head-to-head should be performed to better understand the true efficacy of these treatments.

TL;DR

There is an abundance of evidence for nonsteroid-based procedural therapies in the treatment of AA and Randomized control trials comparing these treatment options head-to-head should be performed to better understand the true efficacy of these treatments.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers