FIGURE 2

![FIGURE 2: Bayesian network meta-analysis ranking of AGA treatments by hair count change reveals the relative efficacy hierarchy among finasteride, minoxidil, PRP, LLLT, and combination therapies. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values are displayed.](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900126/bin/fmed-09-998623-g002.jpg)

> Source: Peter R Feldman et al. "Hair regrowth treatment efficacy and resistance in androgenetic alopecia: A syst." *Frontiers in medicine*, 2022. PMID: [36755885](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36755885/)

<figure>
  <img src="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900126/bin/fmed-09-998623-g002.jpg" alt="Bayesian network meta-analysis ranking of AGA treatments by hair count change reveals the relative efficacy hierarchy among finasteride, minoxidil, PRP, LLLT, and combination therapies. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values are displayed." />
  <figcaption>FIGURE 2. Bayesian network meta-analysis ranking of AGA treatments by hair count change reveals the relative efficacy hierarchy among finasteride, minoxidil, PRP, LLLT, and combination therapies. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values are displayed.<br>  Source: Peter R Feldman et al. "Hair regrowth treatment efficacy and resistance in androgenetic alopecia: A syst." <em>Frontiers in medicine</em>, 2022. PMID: <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36755885/">36755885</a></figcaption>
</figure>