Beschreibung
Sensitivity analysis results testing the robustness of the Bayesian network meta-analysis findings to different prior specifications and model assumptions for AGA treatment comparisons.
FIGURE 7
ChartSource Paper
Hair regrowth treatment efficacy and resistance in androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and continuous Bayesian network meta-analysis.Cite This Figure
 > Source: Peter R Feldman et al. "Hair regrowth treatment efficacy and resistance in androgenetic alopecia: A syst." *Frontiers in medicine*, 2022. PMID: [36755885](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36755885/)
<figure> <img src="https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9900126/bin/fmed-09-998623-g007.jpg" alt="Sensitivity analysis results testing the robustness of the Bayesian network meta-analysis findings to different prior specifications and model assumptions for AGA treatment comparisons." /> <figcaption>FIGURE 7. Sensitivity analysis results testing the robustness of the Bayesian network meta-analysis findings to different prior specifications and model assumptions for AGA treatment comparisons.<br> Source: Peter R Feldman et al. "Hair regrowth treatment efficacy and resistance in androgenetic alopecia: A syst." <em>Frontiers in medicine</em>, 2022. PMID: <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36755885/">36755885</a></figcaption> </figure>
Verwandte Evidenz
A
Minoxidil für Androgenetische Alopezie
A
Bewertung A · 299 Studien
Finasterid für Androgenetische Alopezie
A
Bewertung A · 206 Studien
Nutrafol für Androgenetische Alopezie
A
Bewertung A · 3 Studien
Low-Level-Lasertherapie für Androgenetische Alopezie
A
Bewertung A · 60 Studien
Viviscal für Telogen Effluvium
A
Bewertung A · 8 Studien
Viviscal für Altersbedingte Haarausdünnung
A
Bewertung A · 8 Studien
Nutrafol für Weiblicher Haarausfall
A
Bewertung A · 8 Studien
Nutrafol für Stressbedingter Haarausfall
A
Bewertung A · 8 Studien
Dutasterid für Androgenetische Alopezie
Bewertung A · 99 Studien