Comparison of Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) With PRP Microneedling in Androgenetic Alopecia.
Study Design
- 研究类型
- randomized controlled trial
- 样本量
- 60
- 持续时间
- 12 weeks
- 干预措施
- Comparison of Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) With PRP Microneedling in Androgenetic Alopecia. 3 sessions, each 1 month apart
- 对照组
- Placebo
- 效应方向
- Positive
- 偏倚风险
- Moderate
Abstract
Background Limited data are available on the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and microneedling versus PRP alone. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of PRP and microneedling with PRP alone in androgenetic alopecia (AGA). Methodology This prospective, randomized, interventional study was conducted in Pak-Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, from September 2020 to December 2020. In total, 60 individuals suffering from AGA of up to Hamilton-Norwood grade 4 were randomly assigned to two groups, namely, PRP+microneedling versus PRP alone. A total of three sessions, each one month apart, were offered. Pre and post-intervention photographs, hair count (/cm2), hair-pull test, and physician's and patient's perception of hair loss were recorded. The data were statistically analyzed. Results A greater proportion of patients in the microneedling group achieved a negative hair-pull test and improved perception of hair loss compared to the PRP-alone group (82.1% vs. 51.9% and 88.0% vs. 73.9%, respectively). The percentage increase in mean hair count in the microneedling group (24.53 ± 9.49%) was significantly higher than the increase in the PRP-alone group (17.88 ± 10.15%) (p = 0.011). For grades 2 and 3 hair loss, microneedling+PRP caused a much greater increase in hair count than PRP alone. This difference was less pronounced for Norwood grade 4. No notable side effects were noted in any patient. Conclusions Combined PRP and microneedling is more efficacious than PRP alone in patients with AGA up to Hamilton-Norwood grade 4.
Full Text
Figures
Tables
Table 1
| Descriptive characteristics | Treatment received | Total | ||
| PRP alone | Microneedling + PRP | |||
| Age (years) | 28.17 ± 5.41 | 30.23 ± 7.25 | 29.2 ± 6.43 | |
| Gender | Male | 27 (47.4%) | 30 (52.6%) | 57 (100.0%) |
| Female | 3 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 3 (100.0%) | |
| Hamilton-Norwood grade of alopecia on induction | Grade 1 | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 0 (0.0%) |
| Grade 2 | 13 (59.1%) | 9 (40.9%) | 22 (100.0%) | |
| Grade 3 | 15 (46.9%) | 17 (53.1%) | 32 (100.0%) | |
| Grade 4 | 2 (33.3%) | 4 (66.7%) | 6 (100.0%) | |
| Pain severity perception | Mild | 4 (16.0%) | 21 (84.0%) | 25 (100.0%) |
| Moderate | 14 (60.9%) | 9 (39.1%) | 23 (100.0%) | |
| Severe | 10 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 10 (100.0%) | |
| Very Severe | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (100.0%) | |
| Total | 30 (50.0%) | 30 (50.0%) | 60 (100.0%) | |
Table 2
| Treatment received | Hair loss perception at the end of treatment | Total | |||
| Mild/Moderate | Severe | ||||
| PRP alone | Hair loss perception at baseline | Mild/Moderate | 7 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 7 (100.0%) |
| Severe | 17 (73.9%) | 6 (26.1%) | 23 (100.0%) | ||
| Total | 24 (80.0%) | 6 (20.0%) | 30 (100.0%) | ||
| Microneedling + PRP | Hair loss perception at baseline | Mild/Moderate | 5 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 5 (100.0%) |
| Severe | 22 (88.0%) | 3 (12.0%) | 25 (100.0%) | ||
| Total | 27 (90.0%) | 3 (10.0%) | 30 (100.0%) | ||
| Total | Hair loss perception at baseline | Mild/Moderate | 12 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 12 (100.0%) |
| Severe | 39 (81.3%) | 9 (18.8%) | 48 (100.0%) | ||
| Total | 51 (85.0%) | 9(15.0%) | 60 (100.0%) | ||
References
- A review of the most common dermatologic conditions and their debilitating psychosocial impacts Int Arch Int Med, 2019
- A review of the treatment of male pattern hair loss Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2020
- Relative efficacy of minoxidil and the 5-α reductase inhibitors in androgenetic alopecia treatment of male patients: a network meta-analysis JAMA Dermatol, 2022
- Platelet-rich plasma for hair loss: review of methods and results Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 2018
- Original article: platelet-rich plasma with microneedling in androgenetic alopecia along with dermoscopic pre- and post-treatment evaluation J Cosmet Dermatol, 2018
- Hair follicle regeneration in mice after wounding by microneedle roller Int J Trichol, 2012
- Method 6.11: preparation of platelets from whole blood AABB Technical Manual, 1999
- Platelet-rich plasma (PRP): what is PRP and what is not PRP? Implant Dent, 2001
- Classifications of patterned hair loss: a review J Cutan Aesthet Surg, 2016
- A randomized evaluator blinded study of effect of microneedling in androgenetic alopecia: a pilot study Int J Trichology, 2013
Used In Evidence Reviews
Similar Papers
Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2021
Treatment options for androgenetic alopecia: Efficacy, side effects, compliance, financial considerations, and ethics.
Stem cells translational medicine · 2015
The Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Hair Regrowth: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.
Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2021
Alopecia Areata: an Update on Etiopathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Management.
Cells · 2019
Advances in Regenerative Stem Cell Therapy in Androgenic Alopecia and Hair Loss: Wnt pathway, Growth-Factor, and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Signaling Impact Analysis on Cell Growth and Hair Follicle Development.
The British journal of dermatology · 2013
A randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, half-head study to evaluate the effects of platelet-rich plasma on alopecia areata.
Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2018