Significant improvement with ivarmacitinib after suboptimal response to tofacitinib in severe alopecia areata: a case report and literature review.
Study Design
- Loại nghiên cứu
- Case Reports
- Cỡ mẫu
- 1
- Đối tượng nghiên cứu
- patient with severe alopecia areata with suboptimal response to tofacitinib
- Can thiệp
- Significant improvement with ivarmacitinib after suboptimal response to tofacitinib in severe alopecia areata: a case report and literature review. None
- Đối chứng
- None
- Kết quả chính
- hair regrowth in severe alopecia areata
- Xu hướng hiệu quả
- Positive
- Nguy cơ sai lệch
- High
Abstract
Alopecia areata (AA) is a chronic, immune-mediated hair loss disorder, in which the JAK-STAT signaling pathway plays an important pathogenic role. Available agents for AA include minoxidil, corticosteroids, immunosuppressants and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, among others. For adults with severe AA, JAK inhibitors have emerged as cornerstone systemic treatments, but the responses to them are variable. Ivarmacitinib is a novel and highly selective JAK1 inhibitor, which has been approved for AA in China recently with little real-world evidence. We present a case of a patient with severe AA who achieved significant improvement with ivarmacitinib after suboptimal response to tofacitinib, and review previous studies on switching therapy between different JAK inhibitors for AA. This case suggests that ivarmacitinib is a viable alternative for tofacitinib-refractory AA, possibly due to its higher JAK1 selectivity. Further studies are required to define ivarmacitinib's optimal position in AA treatment algorithm, and to elucidate underlying mechanisms behind JAK inhibitors, which is essential for more personalized and targeted therapy for severe AA.
Tóm lược
A case of a patient with severe AA who achieved significant improvement with ivarmacitinib after suboptimal response to tofacitinib is presented, suggesting that ivarmacitinib is a viable alternative for tofacitinib-refractory AA, possibly due to its higher JAK1 selectivity.
Full Text
Used In Evidence Reviews
Similar Papers
Annual review of nutrition · 2004
Secular trends in dietary intake in the United States.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2002
A randomized clinical trial of 5% topical minoxidil versus 2% topical minoxidil and placebo in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in men.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2017
The effectiveness of treatments for androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Current problems in dermatology · 2015
Alopecia areata.
Drug design, development and therapy · 2019
Minoxidil and its use in hair disorders: a review.
Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2021