Skip to main content
HairCited

Photobiomodulation and alopecia: a crowdsourced survey study on patient preferences.

Briana Paiewonsky, Margo Winter, Maria Hordinsky, MacKenzie Griffith, Ronda S Farah
Other Journal of cosmetic and laser therapy : official publication of the European Society for Laser Dermatology 2023 2 atıf
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'haircited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D38011870'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Çalışma Türü
Cross-sectional
Örneklem Büyüklüğü
60
Müdahale
Photobiomodulation and alopecia: a crowdsourced survey study on patient preferences. None
Karşılaştırıcı
Placebo
Etki Yönü
Neutral
Yanlılık Riski
High

Abstract

Photobiomodulation is a treatment option for hair loss and is currently FDA cleared for androgenetic alopecia. There are a variety of photobiomodulation devices intended for at-home patient use. However, data examining user preferences is lacking. A social media-based, online survey study was completed to understand patient preferences when selecting a photobiomodulation device. Secondary outcomes examined patient experience with the device. Sixty participants responded to the 21-question survey. The majority of participants had never used a photobiomodulation device (n = 50; 86.2%). Most respondents (n = 40; 67.8%) felt the efficacy of the device was the most important aspect to consider when selecting a photobiomodulation device. Additionally, a majority of participants thought 15 (n = 22; 37.3%) or 20 minutes (n = 17; 28.8%) would be a reasonable treatment duration and would prefer a hand-free device (n = 51; 86.4%). Of the eight participants who had used a photobiomodulation device, only one was dissatisfied with the device and discontinued treatment.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers