Skip to main content
HairCited

Platelet-rich plasma for androgenetic alopecia: Does it work? Evidence from meta analysis.

Salvatore Giordano, Marco Romeo, Petteri Lankinen
Meta-Analysis Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2017 92 件の引用
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'haircited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D28296142'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

研究タイプ
Meta-Analysis
サンプルサイズ
60
対象集団
Patients with androgenetic alopecia
介入
Platelet-rich plasma for androgenetic alopecia: Does it work? Evidence from meta analysis. None
比較対照
Control
主要アウトカム
Hair count and thickness
効果の方向
Positive
バイアスリスク
Moderate

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has increased among different surgical specialities for the treatment of various conditions. Androgenetic alopecia is a common condition, with severe attendant psychosocial implications. PRP injections for hair restoration have become a popular practice among plastic surgeons. We performed a meta-analysis comparing local injection of platelet-rich plasma versus control to evaluate this issue in order to investigate the effectiveness of PRP local injections for androgenetic alopecia. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed. Primary outcome was the increase in number of hairs. Secondary outcomes were the increase in hair thickness and the percentage increase in hair number and thickness. We performed random-effect analysis. RESULTS: Six studies involving 177 patients were retrieved and included in the present analysis. A significantly locally increased hair number per cm2 was observed after PRP injections versus control (mean difference (MD) 17.90, 95%CI 5.84-29.95, P=.004). Similarly, a significantly increased hair thickness cross section per 10-4  mm2 (MD 0.22, 95%CI 0.07-0.38, P=.005) favoring PRP group. The pooled results did not show statistically significant differences in percentage increase in hair number (MD 24.12%, 95%CI -12.76-60.99, P=.20) and hair thickness (MD 32.63%, 95%CI -16.23-81.48, P=0.19) among patients treated with PRP. CONCLUSIONS: Local injection of PRP for androgenic alopecia might be associated with an increased number of hairs and some hair thickness improvement in the treated areas with minimal morbidity. The results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution as it consists of pooling many small studies. Larger randomized studies can verify this perception.

要約

A meta‐analysis comparing local injection of platelet‐rich plasma versus control is performed to investigate the effectiveness of PRP local injections for androgenetic alopecia.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers