Skip to main content
HairCited

Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for Endocrine-Induced Alopecia and Persistent Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Study.

Anthony Rossi, Alexander Pan, Christian Menzer, Leore Lavin, Saud Aleissa et al.
RCT Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.] 2026
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'haircited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D40626588'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Tipo di studio
Randomized Controlled Trial
Dimensione del campione
27
Popolazione
Breast cancer survivors with EIA or pCIA
Durata
12 weeks
Intervento
Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment for Endocrine-Induced Alopecia and Persistent Chemotherapy-Induced Alopecia in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized, Controlled, Pilot Study. Monthly for 3 months
Comparatore
Untreated side of scalp (split-scalp)
Esito primario
Global assessment scale change at week 12
Direzione dell'effetto
Neutral
Rischio di bias
Moderate

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) shows potential in treating androgenetic alopecia but lacks evidence for endocrine-induced alopecia (EIA) or persistent chemotherapy-induced alopecia (pCIA). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate safety and efficacy of PRP in breast cancer survivors with EIA or pCIA. METHODS: In this single-center, randomized, controlled trial, EIA and pCIA patients received PRP injections on one side of their scalp monthly for 3 months. Evaluations occurred at baseline and at week 12, followed by an optional cross-arm at week 24. The primary outcome was difference in global assessment scale (GAS) at week 12, assessed by a blinded investigator. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, hair-related quality of life, trichoscopic data, and circulating tumor cell (CTC) assay. RESULTS: Fifteen EIA and 12 pCIA patients enrolled. GAS improved from baseline to week 12 (+1.2 each, p < .001) but not statistically significant between treated and untreated sides ( p > .05). Hair density increased for both sides (+21 and +16 hairs/cm 2 , respectively, p < .05), without difference between the sides ( p > .05). Quality of life showed no improvement (41.1-39.4, p > .05). Adverse events included grade 1 to grade 3 scalp pain. Two of 12 CTC assays detected malignant cells in PRP, but no tumor seeding events were observed. CONCLUSION: PRP may increase hair density in EIA and pCIA patients and showed no adverse cancer outcomes or tumor seeding. Results may be confounded by possible PRP diffusion in split-scalp study design. CLINICALTRIALSGOV ID: NCT04459650.

TL;DR

PRP may increase hair density in EIA and pCIA patients and showed no adverse cancer outcomes or tumor seeding, although results may be confounded by possible PRP diffusion in split-scalp study design.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers