Skip to main content
HairCited

Comparison of Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) With PRP Microneedling in Androgenetic Alopecia.

Anjum Muhammad, Nadia Iftikhar, Asher Mashhood, Zulqurnain Saleem, Madhia Sundus et al.
Other Cureus 2022 11 citazioni
PubMed DOI CC-BY PDF
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'haircited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D36407242'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Tipo di studio
randomized controlled trial
Dimensione del campione
60
Durata
12 weeks
Intervento
Comparison of Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) With PRP Microneedling in Androgenetic Alopecia. 3 sessions, each 1 month apart
Comparatore
Placebo
Direzione dell'effetto
Positive
Rischio di bias
Moderate

Abstract

Background Limited data are available on the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and microneedling versus PRP alone. In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of PRP and microneedling with PRP alone in androgenetic alopecia (AGA). Methodology This prospective, randomized, interventional study was conducted in Pak-Emirates Military Hospital, Rawalpindi, from September 2020 to December 2020. In total, 60 individuals suffering from AGA of up to Hamilton-Norwood grade 4 were randomly assigned to two groups, namely, PRP+microneedling versus PRP alone. A total of three sessions, each one month apart, were offered. Pre and post-intervention photographs, hair count (/cm2), hair-pull test, and physician's and patient's perception of hair loss were recorded. The data were statistically analyzed. Results A greater proportion of patients in the microneedling group achieved a negative hair-pull test and improved perception of hair loss compared to the PRP-alone group (82.1% vs. 51.9% and 88.0% vs. 73.9%, respectively). The percentage increase in mean hair count in the microneedling group (24.53 ± 9.49%) was significantly higher than the increase in the PRP-alone group (17.88 ± 10.15%) (p = 0.011). For grades 2 and 3 hair loss, microneedling+PRP caused a much greater increase in hair count than PRP alone. This difference was less pronounced for Norwood grade 4. No notable side effects were noted in any patient. Conclusions Combined PRP and microneedling is more efficacious than PRP alone in patients with AGA up to Hamilton-Norwood grade 4.

Full Text

PDF
Loading PDF...

Figures

Tables

Table 1

Descriptive characteristics Treatment received Total
PRP alone Microneedling + PRP
Age (years) 28.17 ± 5.41 30.23 ± 7.25 29.2 ± 6.43
Gender Male 27 (47.4%) 30 (52.6%) 57 (100.0%)
Female 3 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 3 (100.0%)
Hamilton-Norwood grade of alopecia on induction Grade 1 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Grade 2 13 (59.1%) 9 (40.9%) 22 (100.0%)
Grade 3 15 (46.9%) 17 (53.1%) 32 (100.0%)
Grade 4 2 (33.3%) 4 (66.7%) 6 (100.0%)
Pain severity perception Mild 4 (16.0%) 21 (84.0%) 25 (100.0%)
Moderate 14 (60.9%) 9 (39.1%) 23 (100.0%)
Severe 10 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 10 (100.0%)
Very Severe 2 (100.0%) 0 (0.0%) 2 (100.0%)
Total 30 (50.0%) 30 (50.0%) 60 (100.0%)

Table 2

Treatment receivedHair loss perception at the end of treatmentTotal
Mild/ModerateSevere
PRP aloneHair loss perception at baselineMild/Moderate7 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)7 (100.0%)
Severe17 (73.9%)6 (26.1%)23 (100.0%)
Total24 (80.0%)6 (20.0%)30 (100.0%)
Microneedling + PRPHair loss perception at baselineMild/Moderate5 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)5 (100.0%)
Severe22 (88.0%)3 (12.0%)25 (100.0%)
Total27 (90.0%)3 (10.0%)30 (100.0%)
TotalHair loss perception at baselineMild/Moderate12 (100.0%)0 (0.0%)12 (100.0%)
Severe39 (81.3%)9 (18.8%)48 (100.0%)
Total51 (85.0%)9(15.0%)60 (100.0%)

References

  1. A review of the most common dermatologic conditions and their debilitating psychosocial impacts Int Arch Int Med, 2019
  2. A review of the treatment of male pattern hair loss Expert Opin Pharmacother, 2020
  3. Relative efficacy of minoxidil and the 5-α reductase inhibitors in androgenetic alopecia treatment of male patients: a network meta-analysis JAMA Dermatol, 2022
  4. Platelet-rich plasma for hair loss: review of methods and results Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am, 2018
  5. Original article: platelet-rich plasma with microneedling in androgenetic alopecia along with dermoscopic pre- and post-treatment evaluation J Cosmet Dermatol, 2018
  6. Hair follicle regeneration in mice after wounding by microneedle roller Int J Trichol, 2012
  7. Method 6.11: preparation of platelets from whole blood AABB Technical Manual, 1999
  8. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP): what is PRP and what is not PRP? Implant Dent, 2001
  9. Classifications of patterned hair loss: a review J Cutan Aesthet Surg, 2016
  10. A randomized evaluator blinded study of effect of microneedling in androgenetic alopecia: a pilot study Int J Trichology, 2013

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers