Treatments for alopecia areata: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Study Design
- Jenis Studi
- Meta-Analysis
- Ukuran Sampel
- 3149
- Populasi
- None
- Intervensi
- Treatments for alopecia areata: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. None
- Pembanding
- no treatment
- Luaran Utama
- None
- Arah Efek
- Mixed
- Risiko Bias
- Unclear
Abstract
Existing guidelines form no consensus for alopecia areata (AA) treatment due to the absence of a universal standard treatment and arbitrary selection of reference arms in randomized control trials (RCTs). The aim is to identify the best treatment and to rank treatments using systematic review and network meta-analysis. Data were extracted by the two investigators independently. Odds ratio (OR) of treatment success rate was pooled using the frequentist weighted least squares approach to random-model network meta-analysis. RCTs providing data of treatment success rate from PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and manual search were included. About 54 RCTs consisting of 49 treatments and 3149 patients were included. Pentoxifylline plus topical corticosteroids had the highest treatment success rate compared with "no treatment," followed by pentoxifylline alone, topical calcipotriol plus narrowband ultraviolet radiation B phototherapy, topical calcipotriol, intralesional corticosteroids, systemic corticosteroids, minoxidil plus topical corticosteroids, topical bimatoprost, psoralen ultraviolet radiation A phototherapy, and tofacitinib. Even with the network meta-analysis, the best treatment because of independent loops and wide confidence intervals could not be identified. Treatment options above may be reasonable strategies, but further comparison is required.
TL;DR
Pentoxifylline plus topical corticosteroids had the highest treatment success rate compared with “no treatment,” followed by pentoxifyinglline alone, topical calcipotriol plus narrowband ultraviolet radiation B phototherapy, topical calypsool, intralesional cortiosteroids, systemic corticosterone, and tofacitinib; treatment options above may be reasonable strategies, but further comparison is required.
Used In Evidence Reviews
Similar Papers
Annual review of nutrition · 2004
Secular trends in dietary intake in the United States.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2002
A randomized clinical trial of 5% topical minoxidil versus 2% topical minoxidil and placebo in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in men.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2017
The effectiveness of treatments for androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Current problems in dermatology · 2015
Alopecia areata.
Drug design, development and therapy · 2019
Minoxidil and its use in hair disorders: a review.
Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2021