Skip to main content
HairCited

Platelet-Rich Plasma in Androgenetic Alopecia: Is It Really Worth the Hype?

Pooja Agarwal, Krishna M Gajjar, Ashish Jagati, Snehal V Chaudhari, Santoshdev P Rathod
Other International journal of trichology 2023 5 citations
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'haircited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D38179010'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

Type d'étude
Controlled Clinical Trial
Population
None
Durée
2 weeks
Intervention
Platelet-Rich Plasma in Androgenetic Alopecia: Is It Really Worth the Hype? 45%
Comparateur
None
Critère de jugement principal
hair growth/density
Direction de l'effet
Positive
Risque de biais
Unclear

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is defined as progressive, patterned hair loss that occurs as a result of androgen-mediated conversion of terminal hairs to vellus hairs. By the age of 60 years, 45% of men and 35% of women develop AGA. The Hamilton-Norwood scale is used to assess the extent and severity of AGA and classify the stages of male pattern hair loss in men, whereas the Ludwig scale is preferred for women. Currently, U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments for AGA include oral finasteride and topical minoxidil. Due to the limited number of effective therapies for AGA, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has become an effective alternative treatment. A number of studies on PRP have shown promising results, leading to increased hair density and thickness with minimal or no side effects. AIMS: We aim to study the safety, efficacy, and side effects of PRP therapy in patients of AGA and to study demographic data in the form of age, sex, age of onset of hair loss, and grade of AGA in patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients, 38 males and 12 females, with AGA were enrolled in the study. PRP was prepared using a double-spin method. Upon activation, PRP was injected in the involved areas of scalp once every 2 weeks for 6 months. Follow-up photos were taken every 3 months. RESULTS: At 6 months, majority of the patients (45%) were unsatisfied and showed no change in hair growth after PRP therapy and few patients were lost in follow-up. Adverse effects were minimal and no long-term serious adverse effects were noted. CONCLUSION: We conclude from the results in our study that PRP therapy is not significantly effective in treatment of AGA. There is a need to develop standard protocols with regard to total length of PRP therapy and spacing between the two sessions of PRP for AGA.

En bref

It is concluded that PRP therapy is not significantly effective in treatment of Androgenetic alopecia, and there is a need to develop standard protocols with regard to total length of PRP therapy and spacing between the two sessions of PRP for AGA.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers