Skip to main content
HairCited

Clinical efficacy and safety of low-dose oral minoxidil versus topical solution in the improvement of androgenetic alopecia: A randomized controlled trial.

Ali Asilian, Aida Farmani, Mina Saber
RCT Journal of cosmetic dermatology 2024 27 اقتباسات
PubMed DOI
<\/script>\n
`; }, get iframeSnippet() { const domain = 'haircited.com'; const params = 'pmid\u003D38031516'; return ``; }, get activeSnippet() { return this.method === 'script' ? this.scriptSnippet : this.iframeSnippet; }, copySnippet() { navigator.clipboard.writeText(this.activeSnippet).then(() => { this.copied = true; setTimeout(() => { this.copied = false; }, 2000); }); } }" @keydown.escape.window="open = false" @click.outside="open = false">

Embed This Widget

Style



      
      
    

Widget powered by . Free, no account required.

Study Design

نوع الدراسة
Randomized Controlled Trial
حجم العينة
65
المدة
24 weeks
التدخل
Clinical efficacy and safety of low-dose oral minoxidil versus topical solution in the improvement of androgenetic alopecia: A randomized controlled trial. Oral minoxidil 1 mg/day
المقارن
Placebo
اتجاه التأثير
Neutral
خطر التحيز
Moderate

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Topical minoxidil is the recommended first-line pharmacologic treatment for male and female pattern hair loss. However, low-dose oral minoxidil has been used off-label with good clinical efficacy and safety. AIM: To compare the effectiveness and safety of topical minoxidil as a first-choice treatment of androgenetic alopecia versus 1 mg daily oral minoxidil. METHOD: Sixty-five AGA patients were randomly allocated to receive either 5% topical solution or 1 mg/day oral minoxidil for 6 months. Treatment efficacy was evaluated by measuring hair diameter, photographic assessment, and patient self-assessment questionnaires. The safety of treatment was checked through history taking and physical examination. RESULTS: Both topical and oral minoxidil groups showed significant improvement in hair diameter after 6 months of treatment (p < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups. The photographic assessment demonstrated a significant improvement in hair density in the topical minoxidil group in all marked points located at 12 cm (p = 0.025), 16 cm (p = 0.034), and 24 cm (p = 0.014) distance from the glabella but not in the oral minoxidil group. Nevertheless, the difference between the two groups was not significant. In each group, over 60% of patients expressed satisfaction with their treatments, and no significant difference was detected between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Although topical minoxidil has a better overall therapeutic effect than 1 mg oral minoxidil, the difference between the two groups was not significant. Therefore, 1 mg oral minoxidil may be as effective and safe as standard topical minoxidil in female and male pattern hair loss.

Used In Evidence Reviews

Similar Papers