Evidence-based treatments for female pattern hair loss: a summary of a Cochrane systematic review.
Study Design
- نوع الدراسة
- Systematic Review
- المجتمع المدروس
- Women with female pattern hair loss
- التدخل
- Evidence-based treatments for female pattern hair loss: a summary of a Cochrane systematic review. None
- المقارن
- Placebo
- النتيجة الأولية
- Hair density in female pattern hair loss
- اتجاه التأثير
- Positive
- خطر التحيز
- Moderate
Abstract
Female pattern hair loss (FPHL) or androgenic alopecia is the most common type of hair loss affecting women with reduced hair density and can have a serious psychological impact. It is characterized by progressive replacement of slow cycling terminal hair follicles by miniaturized, rapidly cycling vellus hair follicles. The frontal hair line may or may not be preserved. The aim of this review was to assess the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of the treatments available for FPHL. Searches included: Cochrane Skin Group Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Clinical Trials in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED, PsycINFO, LILACS and several ongoing trials registries (October 2011). Randomized controlled trials in women with FPHL were identified. Twenty-two trials, comprising 2349 participants, were included. A range of interventions was evaluated, with 10 studies examining varying concentrations of minoxidil. Pooled data from four studies indicated that a greater proportion of participants treated with minoxidil reported a moderate increase in their hair regrowth compared with placebo (relative risk 1·86, 95% confidence interval 1·42-2·43). There was no difference between the number of adverse events experienced in the twice daily minoxidil and the placebo intervention groups, except for a reported increase with minoxidil 5% twice daily. Single studies accounted for most of the other comparisons, which were assessed as either having high risk of bias and/or they did not address the prespecified outcomes for this review and provided limited evidence of either the effectiveness or safety of these interventions. Further well-designed, adequately powered randomized controlled trials investigating other treatment options are still required.
باختصار
Assessment of the evidence for the effectiveness and safety of the treatments available for female pattern hair loss found that a greater proportion of participants treated with minoxidil reported a moderate increase in their hair regrowth compared with placebo.
Used In Evidence Reviews
Similar Papers
Annual review of nutrition · 2004
Secular trends in dietary intake in the United States.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2002
A randomized clinical trial of 5% topical minoxidil versus 2% topical minoxidil and placebo in the treatment of androgenetic alopecia in men.
Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2017
The effectiveness of treatments for androgenetic alopecia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Current problems in dermatology · 2015
Alopecia areata.
Drug design, development and therapy · 2019
Minoxidil and its use in hair disorders: a review.
Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2021