الوصف
Risk of bias assessment for the included PRP studies in immune-mediated alopecias reveals methodological variability across trials, with several domains rated as unclear or high risk due to small sample sizes and lack of blinding.
Figure 4
ChartSource Paper
Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A systematic review.Cite This Figure
![Figure 4: Risk of bias assessment for the included PRP studies in immune-mediated alopecias reveals methodological variability across trials, with several domains rated as unclear or high risk due to small sample sizes and lack of blinding.]() > Source: Kasama Tejapira et al. "Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A sys." *Frontiers in medicine*, 2022. PMID: [36507528](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36507528/)
<figure> <img src="" alt="Risk of bias assessment for the included PRP studies in immune-mediated alopecias reveals methodological variability across trials, with several domains rated as unclear or high risk due to small sample sizes and lack of blinding." /> <figcaption>Figure 4. Risk of bias assessment for the included PRP studies in immune-mediated alopecias reveals methodological variability across trials, with several domains rated as unclear or high risk due to small sample sizes and lack of blinding.<br> Source: Kasama Tejapira et al. "Platelet-rich plasma in alopecia areata and primary cicatricial alopecias: A sys." <em>Frontiers in medicine</em>, 2022. PMID: <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36507528/">36507528</a></figcaption> </figure>